Trash Compactors And Old TVs

How Charlie Irwin made long-stroke, large-pulse, gas-lift compression work

This article was originally published in the October issue of COMPRESSORtech2. We only publish a fraction of our magazine content online, so for more great content, get every issue in your inbox/mailbox and access to our digital archives with a free subscription.

Charlie Irwin is just your average American who loves motorcycles, has filed five patents, developed paint coatings that were used on the lunar lander and rover, writes his own control software and is fortunate not to have been arrested for building and launching his own rockets from his backyard in Houston, Texas, during the space-race era. He, with the help of packager Bob Clark, owner of Clark Compression, is also the man trying to make the use of hydraulic compressors the go-to for gas lift and well-bore treatment.

The need

Though he had been in the gas compression industry for decades, beginning as a field serviceman with no training and learning the trade through books, Irwin’s foray into hydraulic compression didn’t begin until the late 1990s. In 1998, he took his “dream job” to be a field operator in Orla, Texas, as he took over as president of LenOp.

“At the time, Orla had a population of three, and I made it four,” Irwin said.

The job turned out to be a nightmare, but not because Orla is a modern-day ghost town. Irwin was doing gas lifting, but wet gas was damaging compressors.

“I decided I was going to solve the problem,” Irwin said. “I started looking for compressor frames to work with, but I could not buy anything new or used. CSI … and especially Hanover, were buying everything back then. Nothing was available.”

Irwin had to search for something besides high-speed compressors. He remembered seeing a Universal Compression hydraulic compressor back in 1981 and tried to buy one, but they had stopped making them, plus, they had significant problems. Weatherford had also made hydraulic compressors, but they didn’t work for Irwin’s purposes, though, some did work as intensifiers.

With nothing readily available, Irwin decided he would just build his own compressor. He had experience packaging and writing the sizing programs for natural gas compressors when he worked for Energy Industries in the 1990s, and had built separators for Surface Equipment. Irwin had the necessary knowledge.

“Designing really wasn’t the issue; it was more about what was available to work with,” Irwin said. However, he didn’t instantly find success. Irwin’s first design was so obviously going to fail, that he never even built it. If he was going to succeed with a hydraulic compressor design, it was going to have to be significantly different than its predecessors in the industry. So Irwin began to think outside tradition.

A short interview about a costly code mistake
Curious inspiration

“I used to work in the paint industry, and outside they had a big trash compactor. I knew how it worked and decided to try that technique,” Irwin said.

The trash compactor technique was the first major difference from other compressors because it uses variable stroke lengths. Previous hydraulic compressor designs pushed the piston full-stroke every time, which became a problem when any fluid got in the cylinder. The machine would stall and shut down until someone came and fixed it. Even without a fluid problem, if the gas pressure was too high, the compressor would run out of power before it could reach the end of the stroke.

But with a trash compactor, it didn’t matter how much trash was in the bin; or, in this case, how much gas, fluid or both got into the cylinder. The stroke wasn’t controlled by the gas pressure in the cylinder or a set distance — it was controlled by the hydraulic pressure controlling the ram. That meant that as pressure inside the cylinder increased, regardless of the reason, it created more hydraulic pressure needed to push the piston. Once that hydraulic pressure reached a set point, the stroke would stop pushing forward and return with- out the need to travel the full length of the cylinder.

“In the high-speed compressor industry we always dreamed of a rubber cylinder that could change size easily,” Irwin said. “And all of the sudden I had one that I could change the stroke on. And it did it by itself.”

Having the stroke controlled by hydraulic pressure and not gas pressure or distance was a breakthrough in making Irwin’s compressor idea work, but there was still another, perhaps bigger, problem — automated control.

“When you have a liquid pushing a gas, the gas is nice and spongy, but the liquid is very turbulent inside the hydraulic cylinder,” Irwin said. “The piston moves in tiny little jerks all the time, and this wreaks havoc on any kind of controls. All of the modern (sensors) are polling in many microsecond intervals, and all of your current sensors avail- able cannot stand all the millions of cycles of the piston actually moving in tiny jerking motions. We tried PLCs and every type of electronic and mechanical relay for control. The best we could do was about three days of run time. And a lot of times it was down to five minutes. That was the big hurdle. We could get the mechanical function to work, but the controls would get destroyed.”

Once again, it would be outside-the-box thinking using knowledge of a technology that has been obsolete for decades to make his compressor controls work. According to Irwin, the secret sauce to making hydraulic compression has something to do with old TVs.

“I grew up in the ’50s and ’60s. Radio and TV technology was still tube-type back then, and was just starting to move into the transistor era. I had a cousin who had a radio and television repair shop. And for years I went over to his shop and watched him work on stuff, and he taught me all about it and let me have stuff to work on. And yes, I got zapped a few times. He didn’t tell me about those capacitor things; I had to learn about that myself. … I got to where I could fix TVs. I was 13-years-old repairing televisions.

“So after a long time of not finding anyone who could solve my (control) problem, I started looking at a lot of the chips that were available. And I realized I could use some old (TV) technology techniques to lie to the chips. That allowed me to develop a control board that works beautifully with this technology and has no problems with the pulsing action. It’s a little bitty module and it controls a set of bigger heavy-duty relays.”

Exactly how the module works, Irwin and Clark will not say. However, it’s not likely there are too many interested parties who could figure it out.

“There aren’t too many old people like me left alive out there who understood the old technology,” Irwin said.

With the control module in place, Irwin and company were ready to get their compressors to work.

Figure 2. Backwash production unit flow diagram.
Surprise benefits

While the trash-compactor style of compression and Irwin’s unique control module are the key components to making hydraulic compression work, the compressors themselves also comprise some novel features.

The first generation compressor, a “backwash production unit” (BPU), lovingly dubbed “the green machine,” was built in 2001 (Figure 1). This prototype, as well as all of Irwin’s designs, are manufactured by Bowers Equipment in Houston. Patents are held by BI-Comp LLC (Bowers/Irwin Compression).

The two-stage design comprised two long compression cylinders inside one large separator unit. The idea behind the green machine is that the oil and water coming into the separator from the well would act as a coolant for the internal compression cylinders. The heat from compression would also help stimulate the oil/water separation (Figure 2).

A heater treater, separator and compressor were now all in one machine on one fairly portable skid.

During the first field test of the green machine, a few problems arose, but more benefits were discovered. To test the compressor, Irwin and two partners bought an Expro Americas oil well in Buffalo, Texas, that had been dormant since 1996 with the plunger still left in the well. Before being shut in, the well had produced one to two barrels per day, but with the well fluid containing paraffin and low wellhead pressure, the plunger would routinely become stuck. The well was set to be plugged and abandoned.

In 2003, Irwin’s team took their prototype to the well, fired it up, and it broke immediately.

“I had forgot to anticipate thermal expansion inside the hydraulic cylinders,” Irwin said. “I thought the fluids would take care of the temperatures and everything would heat up at the same rate. It didn’t.”

The problem was solved by making nearly all the components free-floating. The cylinders, pistons and rods were all

loose inside the large cylinder. Nothing was rigidly attached other than the flange for the hydraulic oil to enter and the flange for the gas to discharge.

“That was a really unique part (of the design),” Irwin said. “It took the patent office a couple of years to understand it and give me a patent on it. It took their engineering group a long time to see how it could be functional, but by that time we already had them out in the field and running.”

With the new BPU prototype, a 36-hour test was conducted in which the well was stimulated. The result was the production of 42 barrels of oil.

Irwin’s idea, which was originally intended as a solution for gas lifting, worked, but there were benefits associated with the long stroke and large gas pulses he had not anticipated.

“(The pulse into the bottom of the well) creates a wave back into the formation and it moves stuff around,” Irwin said. “So the permeability — which is getting blocked by the fines and the paraffin and asphaltines, as they are always moving toward the well-bore — that stuff gets moved around and cleared up. What we also didn’t know was going on is that this wet gas is acting as a solvent to clean up the well bore. It would be like using barsol or gasoline to scrub the tubulars down. And with the gas being hot, it was also holding water that was salt-free, even though salt-water came up out of the well. So now you have hot water vapor going into the well that is being absorbed by the salts.”

Essentially, the BPU was stimulating and cleaning the well and formation at the same time. It was complete well treatment. But Irwin’s packager, Bob Clark, wasn’t completely satisfied. Although more than 20 BPUs have been built and sold, they are large, heavy and not very portable. Clark asked for a portable compressor that could be taken from well to well for treatment.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email